Focus areas

Responsible Technology & AI

Technology widens what people and organisations can do. It also reproduces errors, inequities and bad decisions faster and at greater scale. The live questions are when to use it at all, how to govern it, and who answers for it when it is wrong. The answers depend less on the technology than on the incentives, information, skills and working practices it lands in.

Technical ambition is the easy part

A sound technology decision rests on evidence, human judgement, governance and the people it lands on. The first question is whether a tool adds anything, not whether it can be built. The next is how someone challenges it, understands its limits, and responds when its output does not fit the case in front of them. These are design and governance questions, and they are far cheaper to answer before the tool is embedded.

The questions we put to a technology

  • Human judgement and accountability

    Keeping meaningful human review, clear responsibility and appropriate challenge around technology used in research, knowledge work or public decisions.

  • Evidence, provenance and limitations

    Making it possible to understand where information comes from, how it has been handled and what its limits mean for use.

  • Unequal effects and access

    Considering bias, accessibility, digital inclusion and the ways a system works differently for people in different circumstances.

  • Governance and information integrity

    Exploring data governance, privacy and security considerations, misinformation risks and the institutional conditions for responsible use.

Some of this work runs through NoviThea Lab, where an idea can be built and tested before anyone commits to it. The Lab exists to explore the question, not to answer every technology question with a product.

Before the tool is chosen

What is the tool meant to achieve, who does it land on, and what happens on the day it gets something wrong?

Discuss this area